Monday, November 8, 2010

It's Reigning Men! And that's not all...

cartoon is from here at PhotoBucket
It's also reigning other male supremacists who are drowning out lesbian human rights and Women's Radical Liberation. The Self-Appointed Misogynistic Trans Spokespeople state that we must agree with them that "Woman" is not what radical feminist women know political womanhood to be.

Given a recent non-exchange with Noah, a transgender-identified person who came here arrogantly posturing as THE spokesperson for a group (of which I'm a part) that has no central political strategy or position on what transgender means or is, I'd like to note that now is a particularly challenging time for Women's Liberation in part because of the Liberal Queer politics of alleged gender ambiguity.

Not only is Women's Liberation threatened, as it always has been, because of the on-going and unrelenting force, terror, propaganda, and crushing oppression coming down from the Religious Right and Secular (Less-Right) Liberals in the West, but due to intensely self-protective and utterly walled-in, well-bolstered patriarchal practices in quasi-Queer society. What with liberalism replacing radicalism as a general viewpoint on gender, all manner of pro-patriarchal theories and practices continue to hold radical theories and lives in an invasive vine-like vice-grip, choking the life out of radical lesbian feminist theories and practices of challenging heteropatriarchal atrocities, institutions, and values to the roots. The roots are thickening and swelling with the help of something called Dominant Queer Politics which looks a lot like what all the other movements for assimilation-without-transformation look like: "Same CRAP, Different Day".

We are dutifully instructed to ignore everything Sheila Jeffreys ever wrote because she's a transphobe. Never mind her book detailing all the ways Contemporary Western Queer culture is virulently anti-lesbian and anti-feminist. Who cares about lesbian rights any more? It's all Queer here all the time. Get used to it. There's no room for the Lesbians at the Queer Culture Inn unless you were assigned male at birth. Who the hell wants radical feminism, anyway? Not the rapists, pimps, and batterers. And now, not the Liberal Queer activists and their non-appointed spokespeople either.

So intensely defensive is a certain trans position among anti-lesbian anti-feminists, that no dialogue is possible--only evangelically self-righteous reprimanding and scolding of us poor ignorant queer folk as if the rest of us, trans or not, intergender or not, intersex or not, women or not, are just idiots in need of trans-Salvation.

I reject as pro-status quo and inhumane any politic that not only refuses respectful engagement--as determined by all parties, not just one--but that consistently refuses radical critique of its own premises, practices, campaigns, and values.

Anti-lesbianism has always been intense. I just never expected Queer community to become so virulently homophobic and lesbophobic, all in the name of the irresponsible and completely unaccountable dictates and directives of these self-appointed Grand Masters of All Matters Having To Do With Gender.

Liberal Queer Politics, including some expressions and manifestations of Trans Politics, has become just one more threat to Women's Liberation and Lesbian Feminist struggles by demanding that Women/Wimmin deny their own experiences and political location as people who are targeted, stigmatised, and injured from birth to death due to the political meaning imposed over and into their bodies. This is not biological determinism or essentialism--it is The Master's social-political theory-in-practice, enforced in interpersonal and institutional spaces, cyber and non-virtual. To be named and stigmatised as a wh*re from birth (meaning, to be raised as a girl who is raised to be a woman) is not an experience shared by anyone identified as male at birth. To be targeted disproportionately for forced intrusion into your genital area is not something people assigned male at birth have to contend with from day one and are assumed to exist to accommodate, welcome, want, and desire. "Women", from the radical feminist viewpoints I'm aware of, are a class of people who are required--upon penalty of death--to accommodate, appease, appeal to, appreciate, applaud, give access to, and approve of men, male supremacy, and anyone with structural male privileges for a portion or all of one's life. A sublime expression of male supremacist privilege is the entitlement to deny to women that you possess it. Some trans people who were raised with some male entitlements claim they too are women, using their male privilege to drill the point home.

To be so abused and devalued from birth to death, for being seen and treated as "not male" is indeed part of a very specific political process and form of oppression, of making human beings female, girl, and woman, by marking, mass marketing, and invading their bodies and terrorising their minds in some very specific ways.

Among trans bloggers there is, you will find, absolutely no agreement about whether being transgender is a biological condition or an entirely social-political one. There is no agreement about what intergender means; whether "transsexual" is a helpful or hurtful term; whether misogyny is rampant among prominent transgender activists. Nor is there an agreed upon process, ethic, or approach for how to resolve any of these matters through respectful discourse and accountable activism (accountable to radical feminist female-assigned-at-birth women/wimmin). What there is, is a kind of new bully in town: the pro-trans bully who is especially intimidating because they've claimed the right to exclusively tell the rest of us who is and is not a bigot, or a transphobe--including those of us who are transgender and intergender.

Among these self-appointed online spokespeople is Noah, who won't listen to anyone who doesn't first agree to check their own radical political views at the threshold, when it is this viewpoint that gets us to challenge heteropatriarchy in the first place. Radical feminism is many things--not one--and one of the things it is and always has been is self-interrogating. What you have when you organise around beliefs that cannot be challenged without being accused of being a bigot or an oppressor is this: a cultural cult of theory and practice. This cultish nature is revealed in the profoundly defensive posturing and reactionary vitriol that comes at anyone who dares challenge these few undemocratically positioned spokespeople. How wonderful for them they self-elect into a life term of being so arrogant and unaccountable to anyone else--especially those they structurally oppress, like female-assigned-at-birth lesbian feminists.

How convenient for dominant-class heteropatriarchs that a relatively new and marginalised while vocal group on the scene--these specific trans bloggers and activists (certainly not all trans bloggers and not all trans activists)--can challenge female-assigned-at-birth women to stop claiming to be "women"; can call any woman who doesn't identify as "cis" to be an anti-trans bigot; and who don't really ever seem to notice how incredibly elitist trans-specific lingo can be and is for most people. Most of us who speak English as a first language, or not, won't and can't even know what the fuck is being said because the terms have no set meaning, in good keeping with the shoddy, mis-appropriated pro-modern, post-modernist fashion that is used to argue the gender-fluidity of a system that is known for its utterly unfluid and stone-crushing effect on female-assigned-at-birth women's lives.

How extraordinarily privileged this group is showing themselves to be with no regard or respect for accountability at all. It's their way or the highway. And the highway is already bloodied with the roadkill of women's bodies maimed, murdered, and tossed out of the vehicle by men who won't ever be challenged by these elitist trans-spokespeople to call themselves "cis"; the male-assigned-at-birth men who stay men-without-prefix get a pass because the misogynistic target of these trans-spokespeople is women--radical feminist women, lesbian separatists, radical lesbian feminists--who govern no states, make no laws, rule no countries, control no institutions, own no media, lead no major religions, and dominate no social spaces except two that some trans people insist, demand, sue, and shove their way into, so as to gain access, regardless of how aggressive, hostile, violating, and triggering it is for the lesbian women who wish to only be with other lesbian women for a few days once a year at most.

The Politics of Patriarchal Liberalism and Individualism never stopped reigning, but now it also reigns in places in the West that once had a radical feminist presence. Say good-bye to all of that. With plenty of assistance from liberal academic programs (that don't do shit to end rape or racism, genocide or gynocide), pro-misogyny, woman-violating trans political practices rule, in the minds and behavior of far too many.

How arrogant, how white het male supremacist, these spokespeople present themselves as being, denying it while they put down everyone who has the unmitigated and anti-patriarchal gall to "disagree". So much for coalition-building across difference.

Noah, if you wish, go build your isolationist arc and collect upon it all those you deem worthy of speaking to you. It is clear you don't wish to be challenged at all. You've cast your lot with neoConservatives, neoLiberals, Libertarians, and Capitalists. Enjoy the party of your choice.

You're not my oppressor but you're also not my ally. I wish you well and support your human-rights-for-all-transgender-people campaign. But because you promote such anti-lesbian and anti-gay practices--denying us the right to claim people in our herstory and history, protesting the right of lesbian-identified women to congregate amongst themselves, please steer clear of this radical profeminist intergender gay blog's project to support the dismantling of the dual-gender hierarchy to below its foundation. Debris will be falling from above and the ground beneath you may be crumbling, if those of us engaged in this struggle have any success.

And Noah: the unicorns are gay and the leprechauns are lesbian. Lola was a gay man. Teena Brandon was a Lesbian woman. That's one view that is just as valid and unbigoted as any other. Find other people to misappropriate from Lesbian herstory and Gay history. You might start with those who self-identify as transgender: we are what we call ourselves--isn't that your politic?

Radical Feminist Lesbian women in the thousands and Radical Profeminist Gay males (intergender or not--all three of us--if that), will continue to wage our own struggles for liberation while you stubbornly remain unwilling to respect our methods of surviving sexually and socially, as the Lola's and Teena's of the world did and do. You're not working for our liberation when you add heaping portions of lesbophobia, misogyny, white male supremacy, heterosexism, and homophobia onto our lives. I cast my lot with radical lesbian feminists over 25 years ago and nothing you're promoting or anything about the way you're behaving is leading me to regret that decision. On the contrary, you've shown yourself to be a supreme patriarchy-protector among patriarchs who want you dead.

Make what you will of gender in your liberal and quasi-essentialist ways. You'll have plenty of support from the already reigning men, who despise you because you socially and liberally transgress the status quo, not because you seek to radically politically transform it.

image is from here
P.S. Your comments are no longer welcome here. You've violated several of the comment policies as it is. Farewell sibling in the struggle. Bon voyage as you ride your elitist, anti-feminist arc. I wish you safe passage.

DIGNITY: RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, 10 November 2010, 6:30pm - 9pm, Urban Zen Center, NYC

With thanks to Brenda Norrell, this is cross-posted from Censored News, *here*.

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Owe Aku in New York Nov. 10: Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples


Lakotas join Amnesty International and Cultural Survival in New York

Censored News
http://www.bsnorrell.blogspot.com

Download or print poster at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/41451888/DIGNITY-Invitation

Owe Aku International Justice Project will participate in a panel discussion at the Zen Center in New York's Greenwich Village that is being co-hosted by Amnesty International, Cultural Survival and the Zen Center. The subject of the evening is to raise awareness of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigneous Peoples currently being "reviewed" by the State Department of the United States, one of two nations in the world to have not endorsed the Declaration. The community is invited for free - see the invitation for information and to rsvp. Owe Aku IJP looks forward to seeing a good turn out from New York's Native community.

Owe Aku International Justice Project
invited to particpate in
"DIGNITY: Rights of Indigenous People."
Wednesday November 10th from 6:30 to 9 PM
Urban Zen Center - 711 Greenwich Street

A panel discussion on the specifics of the Declaration, the importance of human rights, and the need to preserve Indigenous wisdom and customs.

Hosted by Urban Zen and Cultural Survival

Panelists Include:
  • Elsa Stamatopoulou, Former Chief of the Premanent Forum on Indigenous Issues at the United Nations
  • Larry Cox, the Executive Director from Amnesty International
  • Les Malezer, Native Australian of the Gabi Gabi Community, General Manager for the Foundation of Aboriginal and Islander Research Action
  • Kent Lebsock, Lakota, Director, Owe Aku (Bring Back the Way) International Justice Project

PLEASE NOTE: The Native and Indigenous communities are invited to attend that evening as the guests of Urban Zen and Amnesty International.

Those wishing to attend should RSVP at RSVP@urbanzen.org. For more information, a detailed schedule of events, or to register, please visit www.urbanzen.org or call 212.414.8520.
Kent Lebsock
Coordinator

Owe Aku International Justice Program
oweakuinternational@me.com

Saturday, November 6, 2010

Andrea Dworkin and the Phenomenon of Selective Quoting: Another Incident at Yahoo Answers



With click-on highlights from
The Andrea Dworkin Online Library


The image and words above are from here.
I welcome people to go to that site to read the lies 
so often repeated about Andrea Dworkin and her writings.

Here we go again. If it weren't so obnoxious and misogynistic, it'd just be boring: the selective quoting of Andrea Dworkin's work to try and miscast her as a man-hater and to distort the meaning of her literary work--fiction and non-fiction both, using one quote from each! Does anyone read and discuss the content of books any more? Apparently not.

One wonders if the whole world would break open if men and women actually bothered to read and comprehend what Andrea was writing about.

Please click on the title/question just below to link back to Yahoo Answers.

Am i a misogynist?! ...men and women..?

"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig."
"Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice." -- Andrea Dworkin

andrea dworkin was a renowed feminist..a whole generation of feminist looked up to her as their idol..
I dont agree with her.so that implies i am anti-feminist and a misogynist...(thats what a person in one of the other questions said)

all sane people support equality for everyone..i do..but i dont support andrea dworkin so does that make me a misogynist?

there are other well known social figures like robin morgan,sheila cronin who say they are fems but i dont agree with their man hating views....
am i a misogynist?
  • 1 day ago
  • - 3 days left to answer.

Additional Details

@cassa--you dont represent the entire female population..i dont agree with you.

i agree with a lot of women here on several topics rhonda,dark eyes,jade and several other GS regulars....and i also disagree with a lot of males over here...eg:guitar virgin...
so dont go defending or offending someone on the basis of their genitals...:)

@professor-Anyone who spreads the idea that "a whole generation of feminist looked up to her as their idol" is a misogynist.

agreed prof..agreed..you did not respond to the question asked and instead attacked me for a wording of language.....so prof says i am a misogynist....your vote has been taken into consideration..:)
1 day ago
HELENA--thats what i wanted to hear..women coming out and condemning feminist rads but sadly no one does that...
not only does this damage equality wanting feminists but it also means that plenty of women agree with her!!

Fortunately, Toto takes this on again. Thank you, Toto, for covering Yahoo Answers with your careful responses and for forwarding to me the link.

Toto's reply:

Is a fictional character who is raped and brutalized not allowed to make a statement such as the one you quote above? Do you understand that quote is a snapshot of a moment, one feeling, one thought, in that *fictional* woman's life and that she has other things to say too that you don't quote here? How fair do you think that is, and how respectful to Andrea Dworkin?

It's a very sad thing to watch how a informational cyberspace that could educate people, such as Yahoo Answers--which I believe was set up to educate and help people--is instead being used to spread propaganda and ignorance.

She gave a speech to anti-sexist men about human dignity for all people but you don't quote from that. Why? Did you know she lived with a man in a loving relationship for thirty years, and respected and adored her father, brother, and nephew who also respected and adored her?

She always loved men in her life and in the world including male writers of fiction and non-fiction, such as James Baldwin. Have you read the "Communion" chapter in Intercourse in which she carefully and thoughtfully discusses his writings--his writings over a lifetime? It is a profoundly thoughtful discussion about what love and hate does to a person. And she is clearly anti-hate.

I think it is misogynistic and unfair of you to mischaracterize some branches of feminism and some feminists as "man-hating," by quoting one line here and there. You do that without noting what the whole of their work most stood for and is most about. One line of fiction and one from non-fiction isn't sufficient to draw any conclusions.

Which books of hers have you read? Can you summarize one chapter of one book? What is she saying about pornography, brutality, rape, love and hate, and truth and ignorance? What is she describing about how racism and sexism work together to harm women and men's humanity? Does her analysis of how sexual power is misused by men against women mean she hates men, or does it mean she finds rape, battery, and sexual exploitation unacceptable?

That you pull that quote from a fictional work is an act you ought to be responsible for. What you did here, above, is to invite people to once again mischaracterize and dehumanize Andrea Dworkin. Below are more representative quotes of Dworkin's and of other women who were radical feminist writers and activists, some of whom are routinely misquoted or *very selectively* quoted to make the writers appear to hold views that they did or do not hold. Are these quotes "man-hating" to you?

"No one deserves brutality because of what they are, there condition of birth." -- radical feminist Andrea Dworkin

"Truth is harder to bear than ignorance, and so ignorance is valued more--also because the status quo depends on it; but love depends on self-knowledge and self-knowledge depends on being able to bear the truth." -- radical feminist Andrea Dworkin

"The strongest lesson I can teach my son is the same lesson I teach my daughter: how to be who he wishes to be for himself." -- radical feminist Audre Lorde

"Most men are on our side. They like their lives better than their fathers' lives. They like being involved with their children. They like having a better relationship with their women." -- radical feminist Marilyn French

"People can find eroticism in relations with people whom they respect and whom they see as equals." -- radical feminist Catharine MacKinnon

"I believe that all human beings are equal. I believe that no one has the right to authority over anyone else." -- radical feminist Marilyn French

One thing a fictional character stated while enduring the aftermath of the trauma of rape is not *representative* of the whole of the author's work and real life. Nor is the statement about marriage taken entirely out of context--a statement that is historically accurate, by the way. Andrea did lots of research and careful reading before she wrote anything.

You will note I don't conclude "you are a misogynist." I can't, because I don't know you. And you didn't know Andrea Dworkin. You might find a sentence here or there by any author to be objectionable--as I find what you did above objectionable, but that doesn't mean you or anyone else has the right to mischaracterize another, or you, as a "man-hater" or an "anti-feminist." I hope we all reject two quotes as *representative* or *the sum total* of anyone's writing. We owe it to writers who cared so deeply about humanity to be more respectful than that, in my opinion.

Source(s):

Challenge Forbes.com to list Feminist and Women's Human Rights Organisations on Their Website

this tiny image is from here
Forbes is fascinated with and profits from a certain kind of power: the white het male supremacist kind. They exemplify a major media publication that celebrates men who commit atrocities without noting what those atrocities are--against women. But occasionally they and other WHM supremacist media will toss women an acknowledgement or two. Please click on the title just below to link back to that request from Forbes to its readers.

Vote For The World's Most Powerful People

Nicole Perlroth, Taylor Buley and Kevin Adkins, 09.17.09, 06:00 PM EDT

In November, Forbes will publish its ranking of the world's most powerful people. But first, we want to see what readers think. Use the drag-and-drop poll below to register your ranking of who wields the most influence in the nine categories listed. Final scores will be posted in November.

And here's Forbes magazine's online categories offered to us to choose among, Note how many votes there are for celebrities, and how they don't have "human rights activists" or "feminist activists" listed as choices. I guess those come under the category "Do-gooders".


Who are the Most Powerful People?
I am publicly challenging Forbes.com to list as many feminist and women's rights organisations on their website as they can. What follows is an article by Caroline Howard who discusses the problems with how Forbes.com thus far has chosen to acknowledge--or not--feminists doing human rights work globally. Please offer your comments to this important discussion. There is also a conceptual and political problem with listing "the most powerful women" without noting which men are the most powerfully engaged in making sure no women rise to social, religious, or national power. You can also link back by clicking on the title just below.

Thank you, Caroline Howard, for opening up this conversation! -- Julian Real


ForbesWoman

The World’s Most Powerful Feminists And Least Powerful Women

Nov. 4 2010 - 5:00 pm | 2,173 views | 0 recommendations | 8 comments
Dilma Rousseff, minister chief of staff of the...
Dilma Rousseff, President-elect of Brazil. Image via Wikipedia

As part of the Forbes The World’s Most Powerful People package, my colleagues sought out playwright, performer and activist Eve Ensler, best known for The Vagina Monologues and founder of V-Day, to name who are the world’s most powerful feminists.

“It is actually an oxymoron to identify the world’s seven most powerful feminists–the exclusionary nature of that determination is a patriarchal construct in itself,” Ensler said. “Still, I simply couldn’t resist the chance to highlight the great and often invisible work of grassroots feminists.”

Here, her list of seven:

Rada Boric, Croatia: A key European activist and a co-creator of the Center for Women War Victims.

Malalai Joya, Afghanistan: A writer and outspoken activist who has risked her life to demand justice for the ongoing oppression of Afghan women.

Stephen Lewis, Canada: The co-director of AIDS Free World, former deputy executive director of UNICEF and the U.N.’s first Special Envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa.

Pat Mitchell, U. S.: President & CEO of the Paley Center for Media and the former head of PBS, she is an advocate to move women forward in front of and behind the lens.

Agnes Pareiyo, Kenya: Works on the front lines in Africa to end the practice of female genital mutilation and early childhood marriage.

Christine Schuler-Deschryver, Democratic Republic of Congo: A powerful grassroots activist for women in the Congo, and the director of V-Day’s City of Joy–a center for survivors of violence.

Vandana Shiva, India: An environmentalist, she puts women front and center to solve the issue of food security in the developing world.

This is Ensler’s list, but it would have been nice to see the names of more younger feminist activists, such as Iranian women’s legal rights attorney Shadi Sadr, 36, who is part of the “Stop Stoning Forever” campaign, and Somaly Mam, about 40 (her birthday is unclear), a Cambodian who was trafficked into a brothel as a little girl, escaped and now fights the brothels and works to help other girls escape.

The most powerful feminists feature is a sidebar to the World’s Most Powerful People list of the 68 “who matter” most. There are just five women on that list: Angela Merkel (No. 6), Sonia Gandhi (No. 9), Dilma Rousseff (No. 16), Hillary Clinton (No. 20) and Oprah Winfrey (No. 64).

That’s 7% of the list. A small number with a strangely familiar ring to it:
  • 3%: The 13 CEOs running the country’s largest 500 publicly traded companies are female.
  • 4%: The U.S. has one four-star military general, Ann E. Dunwoody, nominated in 2008 and who serves as head of the Army’s supply arm, and a total of 57 active-duty women serving as generals or admirals out of 1,536.
  • 9%: There are 18 female world leaders who are in power (including Rousseff, come 1/1/11) out of the world’s some 195 nations.
  • 11%: Of the Forbes 400 richest in the world, there are 42 women billionaires.
  • Less than 0%: Female religious leaders.
It’s easy to resent the Forbes’s Most Powerful for knighting just five women. Not because the list was NOT researched exhaustively or vetted rigorously. It was. Or that it is biased. It’s not. It’s because while highlighting those with global juice, it also throws into stark relief all those without (just two black faces, both Americans). We are reminded (as if we need to be, thanks much) of the 3%, 4%, 9%, 11% and the zero–and how very far women still are from power parity.

Julian Real's comment:

The idea that feminists ought to be recognised only as individuals or ranked as "most powerful" is a particularly U.S. American idea which seeks to create personal heroes not to support social justice for women globally.

Perhaps we ought consider "some of the feminists who should be recognised and supported for their human rights struggles for women" and "feminist organisations you should know about and financially support". Here's a very partial list, to be added to people named above. In it, there is recognition that most women's rights activists will never be named or recognised, don't speak English, are women Western reporters don't shine any light on, and are usually fighting in extreme poverty, with on-going death threats and attempts against their lives, and perpetually in a context and crucible of men's terroristic wars against women: physical, psychological, sexual, spiritual, social, environmental, educational, economic, religious, and always terribly political.

Yanar Mohammed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yanar_Mohammed
Daw Aung Suu Kyi: http://www.dassk.org/ and
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1991/kyi-bio.html
Ruchira Gupta:
http://www.apneaap.org/founder/founder-profile/profile-ruchira-gupta
Andrea Smith:
http://www.southendpress.org/authors/258
Catharine A. MacKinnon:
http://www.cddc.vt.edu/feminism/mackinnon.html
Antiporn Feminists of London:
http://antipornfeminists.wordpress.com
AWAN: http://www.awanbc.ca/AWAN_May09_Flyer.pdf
Apne Aap: http://www.apneaap.org/about-us/what-we-do
Vancouver Rape Relief and Women's Shelter:
http://www.rapereliefshelter.bc.ca/
AIWN: http://www.asianindigenouswomen.org/
AWID: http://www.awid.org/
Black Women's Rape Action Project:
http://womenagainstrape.net/black-womens-rape-action-project
COAL: Coalition of Activist Lesbians, Australia: http://www.coal.org.au/
CodePink--Women for Peace: http://www.codepink4peace.org/
Indigenous Women for Justice: http://indigenouswomenforjustice.org/
JCP--Jerusalem Center for Peace:
http://www.j-c-w.org/
Libertad Latina.org: http://www.libertadlatina.org/
Sista II Sista/Hermana a Hermana: http://www.sistaiisista.org/main.html
MADRE: http://www.madre.org/
Navdanya.org: http://www.navdanya.org/
Prostitution Research and Education:
http://www.prostitutionresearch.com/about.html
RAWA: http://www.rawa.org/index.php
SisterSong--Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective: http://www.sistersong.net/
Sisyphe.org--Un regard féministe sur le monde:
http://sisyphe.org/
WIDE Network: http://www.wide-network.org/index.jsp?id=19&random=691177368951578
In memory of Wilma Mankiller, tribal leader of the Cherokee Nation,
Women for Wik: http://www.whatsworking.com.au/WomenforWik/who_are.html

In memory of three Haitian Women's Rights Activists killed in the Earthquake:
Myriam Merlet, Magalie Marcelin, and Anne Marie Coriolan:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jan/22/earthquake-kill-haiti-feminists

and in memory of feminist theologian, professor, and author Mary Daly: http://marydaly.org/default.aspx

and in memory of Wilma Mankiller, tribal leader of the Cherokee Nation:
http://www.greatwomen.org/women.php?action=viewone&id=104

All five great women died in 2010. I regret that I am leaving out so many more great feminists and women activists who died this year. And please, once again, support the organisations in ways they welcome your support.

Friday, November 5, 2010

George Takei, My Gay Superhero, takes on the Anti-Gay Bigot and Evil Villian Clint McCance, and Our Superhero Wins.

I saw this posted first *here* by Melissa at The Feminist Texican, and also *here* by Renee at Womanist Musings.

So now it's my turn to spread the cheer. The video is followed by the transcript. I commented over at The Feminist Texican, that this is to me, in a word: "brilliant". I hope every depressed, harassed, or bullied lesbian, bi, trans, and gay male youth watches this over and over again until they are smiling ear to ear.



Hello, I'm George Takei and over the years, I've spoken out on civil rights issues from the Japanese American internment to proposition 8 in California.  The recent suicides of LGBT youths across the country from anti-gay bullying, compels me to speak out again -- in particular against Clint McCance, a school board member in Arkansas -- a school board member who publicly encouraged kids to kill themselves.  Mr. McCance has since resigned and claims he regrets saying things like, "I enjoy the fact that they often give each other AIDS and die." Mr.McCance, you are a douchebag -- that's right a douchebag.  No person, let alone an elected school official whatever their personal or religious beliefs should ever wish death upon another human being. You apologized for your "poor choice in words," but you are always going to be a total douchebag. I can only suspect that you have some, shall I say issues to work out, so I've gone and bought this countdown clock.  I predict that sometime soon, you will find yourself in the headlines again -- this time caught with some rentboy from some South American country and when that happens, I sincerely hope that you do not kill yourself Mr. McCance because no one should ever wish that upon someone else. And if you are a victim of gay bullying, I say this to you, it does get better and there is help out there.  Call The Trevor Project lifeline at 866 4-U TREVOR and don't listen to the douchebags of the world.

And now this, from The Trevor Project:

Thursday, November 4, 2010

The Truth About The Tea Party: It's Fascism, Wealth, and Patriarchy all Rolled Into One Power-block

image is from here
If your political leadership is comprised of filthy rich neoconservative WHM fatcats in power, beware that CRAP's version of fascism in right around the corner. They want to pin "socialism" on President Obama so their bigotry and tyranny can look more moderate and reasonable. But it's always uglier and more corrupt than you are told it is when it comes to mass power being abused. What follows is a cross post from Harambee Radio and Television Network. Please click on the title below to link back.

 
From The Ramparts

 Junious Ricardo Stanton
    The Truth About The Tea Party Movement

        "Koch Industries has denied specifically funding Freedomworks or tea parties directly, however. The company's director of communications wrote ‘Koch companies value free speech and believe it is good to have more Americans engaged in key policy issues. That said, Koch companies, the Koch foundations, Charles Koch and David Koch have no ties to and have never given money to FreedomWorks. In addition, no funding has been provided by Koch companies, the Koch foundations, Charles Koch or David Koch specifically to support the tea parties.’ Koch's director of communications did affirm, however, that the company funds Americans for Prosperity (AFP). TPM's Lee Fang reports that ‘AFP was founded in part by the company's Executive Vice President, David Koch. He is currently the chairman of the board of the Americans for Prosperity Foundation.’ Media Matters also lists the Sarah Scaife Foundation as having given a total of $2.96 million in funding to FreedomWorks.[7] The Sarah Mellon Scaife Foundation is financed by the Mellon industrial, oil, and banking fortune. The Claude R. Lambe Foundation, also controlled by the Koch family, has donated more than $3 million to Americans for Prosperity" Tea Party Funding
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tea_Party_movement_funding

        A little over a year or so ago I started getting E-mail messages from Dick Armey who was calling for rallies and demonstrations against the policies of Barack Obama. How he got my E-mail address I’ll never know. However I noticed the masthead on his literature was called Freedomworks and after receiving more announcements about upcoming marches and demonstrations I did a little Internet research on Armey and Freedomworks. For those of you not familiar with him, Dick Armey was a former US Congressman who rose to the rank of Majority Leader when the Republicans took control of the House during the 90's. He eventually left Congress and took on the role as Chairman of Freedomworks an organization dedicated according to it Website to: lower taxes, less government and more freedom. Looking at their Website www.freedomworks.org/issues you see they profess to be against government regulation and for tax and tort reform, school choice, privatization of Social Security and reform of Medicare.

         So while their Website appears benign and ideologically non- threatening, the tip off that they are not libertarians is the fact that nowhere on their Website do they take a stand against the ongoing wars that are draining this country dry; nor do they mention the bailouts of the insurance, banking and Hedge Fund industries by the same government they want to shrink. So it was not surprising to me when it came to light that Freedomwokrs is a front for the Koch Brothers, two energy industry billionaires who have their own aggressive right wing agenda. According to SourceWatch a group that, "profiles the activities of front groups, PR spinners, industry-friendly experts, industry-funded organizations, and think tanks trying to manipulate public opinion on behalf of \fs23ulcorporations or government.", the Tea Party is being funded by super wealthy right wingers to promote their own conservative agenda.

         "Reports indicate that the Tea Party Movement benefits from millions of dollars from conservative foundations that are derived from wealthy U.S. families and their business interests. Is appears that money to organize and implement the Movement flows primarily through two conservative groups: Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks. In an April 9, 2009 article on ThinkProgress.org, Lee Fang reports that the principal organizers of Tea Party events are Americans for Prosperity and Freedom Works, two ‘lobbyist-run think tanks’ that are ‘well funded’ and that provide the logistics and organizing for the Tea Party movement from coast to coast. Media Matters reported that David Koch of Koch Industries was a co-founder of Citizens for a Sound Economy (CSE), the predecessor of FreedomWorks. David Koch was chairman of the board of directors of CSE.[2] CSE received substantial funding from David Koch of Koch Industries, which is the largest privately-held energy company in the country, and the conservative Koch Family Foundations, which make substantial annual donations to conservative think tanks, advocacy groups, etc. Media Matters reported that the Koch family has given more than $12 million to CSE (predecessor of FreedomWorks) between 1985 and 2002" http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.p

         In case you haven’t figured it out by now, the Tea Party movement isn’t a spontaneous grass roots movement after all. Disaffected whites are being manipulated by some very cunning Republican right wingers who are exploiting the fears, frustrations and angst of white folks who see their net worth and standard of living deteriorating at a rapid pace. These white folks are looking for someone to blame because they mindlessly drank the Kool-Aid about their house always appreciating in value, believing they could keep using it like an ATM machine ad infinitum. Now they are facing default, unemployment and homelessness; they are angry and frightened. While their frustrations are real and justified, the so called spontaneity of the Tea Party movement is not. Yes people are upset but like me many of them received E-mails and letters from Dick Armey and Freedomworks urging them to attend town meetings, rallies and demonstrations against Obama’s Healthcare Bill and other domestic policy issues. Armey and the Republican Party recruited Glen Beck and Sarah Palin to be their celebrity spokespersons and Fox News a bastion of fascist propaganda anyway, readily jumped on board to support the movement. Don’t be mad at the Tea Baggers, they are being duped and used by the right wingers for their agenda.

         The left-right divide is used by the ruling elites to cunningly keep the masses duped, distracted, disorganized and discombobulated. This way the people won’t come together to figure out how the banksters, military industrial complex war mongers, the multi-national corporations their political puppets and stooges are ripping us off. Both sides of the political aisle are bought and paid for. It’s not just the Tea Party, it’s the left too. Don’t you ever wonder who funds the NAACP or how Al Shaprton flies all over the country to attend "grass roots" rallies? If you want to see who is funding most of the organizations on both the left and right go to www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=338 which is a right wing Website by the way; and peruse their Funding The Left and Right page. Click on the various spreadsheets they provide and look at the names of the foundations putting out money to fund supposedly grass roots movements.

          I have nothing against philanthropy but when money is used as a means for clandestine political manipulation that’s a different story. The ruling elites have mastered funding both sides in a dispute, that way no matter who wins, they come out on top and the "winners" owe them. They do it in political campaigns and war. Don’t fall for the okey-doke and flim-flam. The Tea Party is being used by right wingers to further their own agenda, just like some so called progressive organizations are funded by the left to promote their agenda.

By Stone or By Rope: Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani Will Die Because of Patriarchal Mandates for Misogynistic Atrocity

Most patriarchies have their own cultural methods of terrorising and murdering women for crimes women did not commit. And within many patriarchies, the crime is simply "being a woman". When will men stop their brutal, gynocidal carnage against womanity? What follows is from The Guardian.co.uk. Please click on the title below to link back. What will men do to stop other men from murdering women? When will men see opposing these atrocities, and stopping men from committing them, as a top priority human rights issue?

Iran stoning case woman to be 'hanged'

Human rights group claims Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani is to be executed for murder instead of adultery
A demonstrator holds an image of Sakineh 
An image of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani held during a rally in support of her in front of the Iranian embassy in Rome in September. Photograph: Filippo Monteforte/AFP/Getty Images


An Iranian woman whose sentence of execution by stoning for adultery provoked a worldwide outcry will instead be hanged for murder on Wednesday, a human rights group has said.

"The authorities in Tehran have given the go-ahead to Tabriz prison for the execution … Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani," the International Committee Against Stoning (Icas), a German-based campaign group, said on its website.

"It has been reported that she is to be executed this Wednesday, 3 November."

Officials in Iran were unavailable to confirm or deny the report.

Ashtiani's stoning was suspended after prominent political and religious figures called the sentence "medieval", "barbaric" and "brutal". Brazil, a close ally of Iran's, offered to grant asylum to the 43-year-old mother of two.

A government spokesman said in September that Ashtiani's adultery conviction was under review but the charge of being complicit in the murder of her husband was still pending.

Under the law in force in Iran since the 1979 Islamic revolution, murder is punishable by hanging, and adultery by stoning.

The Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, fended off questions about the case from reporters when he attended the UN general assembly in September, condemning what he called the fabrications of hostile western media and denouncing the US as hypocritical for its capital punishment record.

The case has worsened relations between Iran and the west, which are locked in a dispute over Tehran's nuclear programme and were further complicated last month when two Germans were arrested in Iran while conducting an interview with Ashtiani's son.

The pair entered Iran with tourist visas and were not authorised to act as journalists, judicial officials said. The German government is trying to secure their release.

In August, Iranian television aired an interview with a woman it said was Ashtiani admitting a relationship with a man who had gone on to murder her husband. Icas called the TV show "toxic propaganda".

The US has imposed sanctions on eight senior Iranian officials, including the commander of the Revolutionary Guards and several cabinet ministers, for human rights abuses.

That is in addition to the sanctions over Iran's nuclear activities, which it fears are aimed at making an atomic bomb, something Tehran denies.

According to Amnesty International, Iran is second only to China in the number of executions it carries out, having put to death at least 346 people in 2008.