Please spread the word about this event ASAP: Zami '10: A Community Cipher on Haiti, Hope, and Homeland

 [image is from here]

This is a cross post from here @ http://alp.org/content/zami-10-community-cipher-haiti-hope-and-homeland, and also at that site, there is a downloadable flyer you can print out and post.

When: Friday, May 7, 2010 - 7:00pm - 9:30pm
Where: SOHO Lofts - 167 Spring Street (Buzzer 3), New York, NY 10012
View Map

The Cipher Project in partnership with The Audre Lorde Project and Queer Black Cinema presents:


Zami '10: Haiti, Hope, and Homeland - a community forum focused on raising conversation about Haiti, its history, and current status post-earthquake. We invite all members of the community to come and take part in our cipher and make connections between what is happening in Haiti (and why) and what is happening their various "homelands," whether those be other countries, identities, bodies, etc.

The Cipher Project believes that if we begin to understand the intersecting struggles and celebrations we hold with other communities, we can begin to bond, grow, and work as a collective for the justice of all of our communities. Though our initiative serves women and the lgbtq community this community cipher is for everyone.

Proceeds will be donated through  Partners In Health

Emceed by the lovely  Micia Mosely

Friday, May 7, 2010 from 7PM-9:30PM
SOHO Lofts - 167 Spring Street (Buzzer 3), New York, NY 10012

CipHER Speakers
Naima Penniman and Alixa Garcia
Kay Ulanday Barrett
Kim Ford (The Audre Lorde Project)
Berlotte Israel (Dwa Fanm)
Mario J. LaMothe (Ph.D candidate and Hatian Earthquake Survivor)

Featured Performances Climbing PoeTree
Sweet Lorraine
Live words and letters from earthquake survivors
Live Music and more

Items/services will also be available for purchase to benefit Haiti including: - Headshots for Haiti by Rebecca Pinard
- Silent Auction
- Original art for sale
- Raffles
- and more

**DINNER WILL BE SERVED AT 7PM SHARP**
LIMITED SPACE! REGISTER HERE: Online Form
Suggested donation at the door - $10. NO ONE will be turned away for lack of funds.

[CASH and CARD accepted for entry, silent auctions, all sales and donations.]

Inquiries: Contact Cleopatra LaMothe and the committee at zamilikeme@gmail.com
Facebook Event; Twitter

The Report from the Association for Women's Rights in Development, Forum 2008, is now online!

The logo above as well as what follows is all cross posted from the AWID.org website, here @ http://www.awid.org/Issues-and-Analysis/Library/The-Power-of-Movements-now-online.

The 'Power of Movements' now online!

Source: AWID

07/04/2010 11:55 am

We are excited to announce the launch of a new section of our website: ‘The Forum 08 in Review’. At the last AWID Forum, nearly two thousand women’s rights activists gathered in Cape Town to debate and strategise around the ‘Power of Movements’.

Read about the impact, and achievements of this key event, share in the discussions that took place over the four days including the plenary sessions and most popular breakout sessions and reflect on what the Forum meant for you through personal testimonies, poetry and photos that capture some of the tremendous energy, passionate debate, and principled solidarity that is a hallmark of AWID forums.

We hope that this resource will contribute to sharing some of the big ideas that came out of AWID Forum 08 and, at the same time, remind you that the power of women's movements is making a difference, all around the world. 

Save the date! 12th AWID International Forum on Women’s Rights and Development
We are excited to announce that the 12th AWID Forum will be held in Istanbul, Turkey in April 2012.
The Forum is a key space for women’s movements around the world to strategise, renew, re-energise and develop innovative solutions to pressing women’s rights issues. We very much hope you will join us there.
More information on the 12th AWID Forum will be available in the coming months on www.awid.org so please visit the site regularly for the latest updates but for now, please save the date!

Pornography Use Is Causal in Creating Men's Misperceptions of Women and Sex

[image of book cover not discussed below is from here]

As noted in other posts, sociobiology, evolutionary psychology, and "brain studies" are out to demonstrate the biologal components of sexual political force, rather than seeking to help the public realise how much political force goes into shaping human beings' proclivity to be oppressive and acquiescent and accommodating to oppressive conditions. We're more likely to be told by dominant media that white het male supremacist harm is a product of brain function, not institutionalised social forms of racist, heteropatriarchal coercion, aggression, and terrorism. It's not the "male brain" that is hijacked by pimps and the materials they mass market. It's women's freedom. It's not "the limbic brain" that is impacted by pornographers, it's men's behavior collectively. Do men have brains that are impacted by, you know, reality? Of course. But the values and ideologies are in place before the brains are structured to respond as they do. Some of this is alluded to in what follows, and some of it is not.

The liberalism, individualism, and pseudo-scientific psychologism of many contemporary Western societies will forget that there is actual force being exercised socially against whole groups of people, in order to allow privileged people to maintain control and dominance over them. But you won't get that perspective from dominant cultural magazines and well-financed books. The truth about systematised patriarchal dynamics doesn't sell as well as lies that make us thing "it's all in our heads".

For me, the more important question is not about the functioning of the biologically gendered brain, as Psychology Today suggests. For me the more pertinent question is this: "Is your racist misogynistic society's mass marketed pimp-owned  and operated media, along male supremacist entitlements and privileges to behave like a sexist jerk, along with normalised presentations of rapist ideas as natural, distorting your vision, thoughts, feelings, and behavior in a way that is negative and harmful to women?" But they'd rather frame it up in the following way. Regardless, some good information is surfacing about men's destructive behaviors. My problem, one of them, anyway, is that these articles and books privilege and prioritise concern about the oppressor and HIS humanity, not the oppressed and the destruction of theirs by men's patriarchal institutions and interpersonal practices. So "the harm" is always "to men". As if anyone who gives a shit about human rights should ignore what the impact on women is of men's mass consumption of pornography. Then again, these are not human rights activists who are publishing this stuff, so I shouldn't expect much more than we get from them.

[What follows if from the notoriously apolitical magazine, Psychology Today, *here* and *here*.] 


April 7, 2010, Sex

Porn and Perception: Is Your Limbic Brain Distorting Your Vision?

Porn could be changing how you see your life.

Published on April 7, 2010

Can frequent porn use change users' perception in unexpected ways? Within a month or two of stopping porn, former users posting on my website's forum report greater clarity and optimism, and less dissatisfaction with their lives. They also see women and relationships differently. It may be that porn's effects are more invasive than generally acknowledged—even if devilishly difficult to measure. Said one guy:

Eight or nine years ago, I started to watch porn daily. Today I am 21. I masturbated at least once a day, but often up to 6 times. I truly thought it had no effect on my personality, but one day I realized that I had sort of a split personality. When horny I saw women as an objects for satisfaction, as vaginas with two legs. I know this sounds really degrading. On the other hand all my friends thought the same way, so I never got a reality check.

A perception shift is subtle. It's usually gradual and is seldom apparent to the person affected. Indeed, it may be evident only after clearer perception is restored. (Contrast such a shift with erectile dysfunction, a very tangible symptom that more and more heavy porn users report since free Internet videos became widely available some five years ago.) It may be that comparing the outlooks of today's users during use with their outlooks a couple of months after porn use stops would reveal more than relying on snapshots in the form of self-reports, i.e., merely asking current users about porn's effects. Here are recent excerpts from the posts of a long-time porn user. After a month without porn, he decided to stream some new porn videos without masturbating and record his impressions.

The third and fourth videos were much like the second: poorly shot and neither of the participants appeared to be engaged in what they were doing. The fourth was a close-up film that most definitely would have excited me in the past, but for some reason appeared today to be more like a cooking show in which the chef was preparing some kind of meat recipe. The fifth video was the only one that I watched in its entirety—seven minutes. An amateur was filming his girlfriend (I sincerely hope not his wife) just prior to sex. She was protesting about the filming, asking him to turn off the camera, and to not zoom in on her genitalia, but he insisted on doing both. He then left the camera on a surface to film (against her instructions) while they fucked.

The non-consensual aspect of their interaction troubled me deeply, but I must admit that I have viewed this kind of material before and totally ignored that. Anyway, at first both appeared to be enjoying it. Then, the guy initiated anal sex, but it was essentially rape. The woman protested quite clearly. The guy did not listen to her pleading, and did not appear to change his pace/lubrication in response to her protests. Soon, the woman appeared to retreat inside herself, not saying anything but occasionally gasping (in pain, it was clear), apparently working very hard to endure. When the guy finally finished, the woman sighed with more relief than I thought possible, and began whimpering quietly. I am fully aware that there are anal-pain fetish videos, and have (regrettably) seen many, so I am confident that this was genuine pain. I know that I would have had an orgasm to this video if I had been masturbating, and I also know that I would have selectively ignored all of the disturbing consensual problems, perhaps even internalizing or normalizing them.

He shut that browser and captured his thoughts:

I now realize that much of the pornography I've been watching is either not really exciting or basically exploitation. My attitude is changing. In the past, I have typically fast-forwarded past any vaginal sex or emotionally positive interactions to the anal bits. Also, in the past, I have often felt strong resentment toward my wife for her unwillingness to emulate porn, but today I feel remorse at how I have treated her, and gratitude that she still seems to unconditionally love me. Well, not unconditionally, but rather unselfishly.

A week later he reflected further on his experience:

Until recently, I believed that I could never get enough sex, and that I was unlucky because I married a woman who prefers sex not more than once every other day and does not accommodate indiscriminate penetration of every orifice. But then I successfully got through 31 days without watching pornography, masturbating only minimally, genuinely trying to appreciate my wife for her sexuality on its own terms, and actively suppressing the fantasy/obsessive urges that have progressively insinuated themselves on my personality over the last decade.

Following this experimental reduction of my 'sexual expression,' it has become evident that the emphasis our culture places on sexual activity, or more accurately, the emphasis on sexual activity that I was 'free' to develop as a member of our culture, has been detrimental to my emotional development, to my marriage, to my fundamental attitude toward women as a category, and has restricted my breadth of experience.

I have not yet calculated the amount of time I devoted to masturbating, pornography, fantasy, projecting sexual dissatisfaction as dissatisfaction with life, etc., but I have probably lost years. I'm not yet free from sexual compulsion, but I truly feel, for the first time in probably 16 years, that my life still has the potential to offer deep, meaningful experience without also including a hyperactive sexual component. This vision of freedom from compulsion is completely novel. The fantasies and the basic dissatisfaction with my sex life have not returned with any of their usual force. My perception of my wife is changing, too. She looks increasingly attractive. That can only be a positive development!

Read more perception shifts recorded by past users. Also see Lance Tracy's Adult Entertainment: Disrobing an American Idol, a clever, humorous documentary about an experiment that revealed the same phenomenon. How can viewing porn change perception? Probably by desensitizing the reward circuitry in the limbic brain. This primitive region of the brain colors how we see the world. When it's in balance we tend to see things with greater clarity and optimism. When it's out of balance our impressions are often distorted. Pharmaceuticals, stress and over-stimulation can alter our perception. When this occurs, our focus, priorities and even our values can shift—all without our awareness. In the case of too much stimulation, the shift is in the direction of overvaluing superstimuli. As biologist Robert Sapolsky explained in Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers:   Unnaturally strong explosions of synthetic experience and sensation and pleasure evoke unnaturally strong degrees of habituation. This has two consequences. As the first, soon we hardly notice anymore the fleeting whispers of pleasure caused by leaves in autumn, or by the lingering glance of the right person, or by the promise of reward that will come after a long, difficult, and worthy task. The other consequence is that, after awhile, we even habituate to those artificial deluges of intensity. ... Our tragedy is that we just become hungrier.

Thanks to the way our brains work, chronic over-stimulation fails to satisfy; it can leave a person nearly insatiable. Someone may find himself wondering automatically about every woman, "Would she engage in...?" Also, any resentment that arises from the mismatch between his virtual reality and his physical reality may raise doubts about his partner/union, making him uncharacteristically irritable and self-absorbed. He'll focus on what his relationship doesn't offer, not on what it does. Nor does dissatisfaction necessarily stop there. Humans tend to project such feelings automatically onto other aspects of life as well. Existential angst anyone?

Sadly, distorted perception born of neurochemical dysregulation can make a person extremely resistent to understanding what's really driving him or what would ease his misery. His limbic brain has him firmly convinced that only his drug of choice will restore his good feelings.

It can take an uncomfortable month or two to restore normal perception after habitual overstimulation. But as ravenous feelings ease, it's easier to find satisfaction in every aspect of life.