tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post3924544785030921790..comments2024-03-13T11:14:26.768-04:00Comments on A Radical Profeminist: Richard Burns is a Stupid Prick: proof in this postUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-84553777056117002062010-08-02T11:35:02.414-04:002010-08-02T11:35:02.414-04:00"misogynazis" -- I like it!!
Yes, t'..."<b><i>misogynazis</i></b>" -- I like it!!<br /><br />Yes, t'would have been more realistic (and would've rhymed better, too!) had William Congreve written<br />"Heav'n has no Rage, like Love to Hatred turn'd,<br />Nor Hell a Fury, like a WHM spurn'd."<br /><br />I also got a kick out of this one from Richard Burns:<br />"By the way I have never used the services of a prostitute <b>[and you're probably one of the millions of WHMs that has NEVER made of use of pornography either, right?]</b> but I will defend the rights of anyone who chooses to do so, <b><i>provided both parties are consensual."</i></b> (bold and italics were added by me)<br />Agreed, we should be targeting only those prostitutes who force their lips around the protesting male's dick and then demand to be paid for the unwelcome act.<br /><br />And as for this, "After all many marriages are little more than glorified prostitution arrangements.", I recall hearing a white male guest on some talk show many years ago spouting this same drivel, calling housewives/homemakers little more than overpaid prostitutes. Yet blame for the devaluation of the stay-at-home-mom or homemaker is placed squarely in the lap of feminists/feminism by both WHMs and many WHFs.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15280718300138682860noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-14035329779982414962010-08-01T14:06:32.916-04:002010-08-01T14:06:32.916-04:00Thank you, Patti.
Forget their ridiculous moniker...Thank you, Patti.<br /><br />Forget their ridiculous moniker "feminazi". What you posted, and what people like Rush Limbaugh, Howard Stern, Bill O'Reilly, and Glenn Sacks, along with the likes of the capitalist pimps and "communist" patriarchs like Zebert demonstrate is what we have to highlight and what society ought to be organising against are these <b><i>misogynazis</i></b> who spit out and spew their domineering and bullying CRAP wherever they go.Julian Realhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02933612851144914687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-84425022240478494712010-08-01T12:30:36.128-04:002010-08-01T12:30:36.128-04:00"I've yet to read or hear of one male who..."I've yet to read or hear of one male who has died through lack of sexual access to a woman's/girl's body. Men do not need sex in order to survive - but all women and men need food, water, shelter and safety from predators. Women however are in most danger from sexually predatory men who justify their pseduo right of unlimited 24/7 sexual access to any woman/girl because they will supposedly die a horrible death if their penises are not satisfied."<br /><br />Well, maybe each individual WHM won't die a horrible death if their penis is not satisifed by not having 24/7 access to any/all women/girls, but apparently our <b><i>entire species</i></b> will be doomed, according to this member of the WHMS site called The Spearhead:<br /><br /><b>Communize the Cunt</b><br /><i>by Zebert » Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:59 pm</i> <br /><br />In our economic system women exchange their sexuality for access to power because they are born with two products that men want - sexuality and beauty. Men must design a political or economics system that removes the ability of women to decide who accesses their sexuality. Men must communize the cunt.<br /><b>Solution</b><br />All women must be herded into sex farms where all men will have free and equal access. We must communize the cunt. If we don't, our species is doomedUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15280718300138682860noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-73032490038810953872010-04-16T10:08:26.434-04:002010-04-16T10:08:26.434-04:00Hi Jennifer,
Yes, their penises, which het men us...Hi Jennifer,<br /><br />Yes, their penises, which het men use to think, or so they say. Or are their brains in their testicles? It varies depending on the het guy, I guess.<br /><br />And a white woman and white man I knew, both relatively young, prepared to travel cross-country by bicycle. They each brought what they'd need for provisions.<br /><br />She brought pepper spray. He brought "bear repellent". That says it all about who is dangerous to whom.Julian Realhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02933612851144914687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-48518105221585185902010-04-16T07:22:11.237-04:002010-04-16T07:22:11.237-04:00Richard Burns is a pro-prostitution apologist. Why...Richard Burns is a pro-prostitution apologist. Why oh why is the issue of male demand conveniently ignored by men such as Richard Burns. Women did not create prostitution - but men certainly did and it continues to be men who are the ones demanding women and girls be reduced to men's sexual service stations. <br /><br />Claiming prostitution is 'acceptable' provided both parties 'consent' is similar to arguments once promoted wherein slavery was claimed to be 'acceptable' because the enslaved women's and men's lives were supposedly far worse when free than when they were enslaved by white male Europeans.<br /><br />Burns conveniently ignores the fact prostitution causes immense physical, mental and emotional harm to the women and girls involved in prostitution. No instead the issue is reduced to one of 'choice and/or 'consent.' But there can be no 'free informed consent' when women and girls have no other option but to engage in prostitution in order to survive financially. Nor for that matter can prostitution be simnplistically reduced to forced prostitution or 'choice prostitution.' Fact is majority of women and girls in prostitution want to exit and they do not want their daughters/female friends to experience what they have suffered at the hands/fists and penises of Johns.<br /><br />Oh and once again that tired old justification has been used because another pro-prostitution apologist supposedly knows one woman who freely entered prostitution and guess what? She found happiness with a John. One example does not cancel out the massive male sexual exploitation of women and girls, just because male heterosexuality is always in supposedly in constant need of 'female sexual service stations.' <br /><br />I've yet to read or hear of one male who has died through lack of sexual access to a woman's/girl's body. Men do not need sex in order to survive - but all women and men need food, water, shelter and safety from predators. Women however are in most danger from sexually predatory men who justify their pseduo right of unlimited 24/7 sexual access to any woman/girl because they will supposedly die a horrible death if their penises are not satisfied.JENNIFER DREWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02112807166372869685noreply@blogger.com