tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post2073905441215679252..comments2024-03-13T11:14:26.768-04:00Comments on A Radical Profeminist: U.S. Defence Department Employees and Contractors Secretly Purchase Photographs of Children Being Raped and are Not Charged with Committing Any Crime: Anything Wrong with That Picture?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-14621491075079769712010-09-06T12:15:33.336-04:002010-09-06T12:15:33.336-04:00Yes, Jennifer.
Thank you. It is rather sobering t...Yes, Jennifer.<br /><br />Thank you. It is rather sobering to see how UNcriminal human rights crimes-against-humanity become when the population of perpetrators is a certain class of institutionally protected white men and the population of those harmed and violated in unambiguously heinous ways are female and/or children.<br /><br />Protection of entitlements and privileges by men to perpetrate against women is a necessary component of any patriarchal system. <br /><br />It is beyond me how reasonable, humane, caring, compassionate people can decide that we live in a post-feminist era with rampant gross sexual abuse and slavery when, as you highlight, it is MEN who are the primary predatory abusers, and females of various ages who are the primary population of victims. <br /><br />When do we get to the post-PATRIARCHAL era?Julian Realhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02933612851144914687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-62483862424709341822010-09-05T18:07:07.047-04:002010-09-05T18:07:07.047-04:00How convenient that this report on military person...How convenient that this report on military personnel and private contractors purchasing/viewing child porn, not once mentions the biological sex of the 'people' using child porn. <br /><br />Given military careers are apparently at risk if the perpetrators were to be charged I doubt very much the individuals viewing child porn are women because overwhelmingly military careers and private contractors contine to be male-dominated and hence 'people' is code for men. <br /><br />So why does the article deliberately hide the biological sex of the buyers of child porn? Because the fact such purchasers are powerful men must always remain hidden. Women however are never accorded this 'privilege' rather their biological sex is always the first word mentioned in headlines and within the body of news reports. Women are never 'people' or 'individuals' - no they are always women. <br /><br />This report also demonstrates for the umpteenth time how white male power operates, because powerful men who view child porn are deemed to be 'above the law' since this is only applied to all women and those men who are not white and powerful.<br /><br />It matters not one iota that certain powerful males can be blackmailed because of their obsession with viewing child porn. The real issue is these men are committing a crime in viewing child porn and yet that is ignored because their viewing female and male children being subjected to sadistic male sexual violence is trivalised because the male viewers/purchasers are supposedly 'vulnerable to blackmail.' What about the rights of the girls and boys who are being systematically subjected to male sexual violence in order that adult men can be 'entertained?'<br /><br />Oh so it is fine for men in very powerful positions to view images of males engaged in sadistic sexual torture of girl and boy children and their proclivity in such viewing must be protected at all times. The atrocities males commit against girl and boy children is apparently irrelevant because the only issue is supposedly combatting 'terrorism.'<br /><br />Filming males engaged in sadistic sexual torture of girls and boys is systemic terrorism and violates all children's human rights, but once again men's interests, men's desires, men's 'needs' always supercede those supposedly inferior beings - girls' and boys' right not to be subjected to male sexual violence for the 'entertainment' and pleasure of adult male buyers.JENNIFER DREWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02112807166372869685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-73588500857952440422010-09-05T08:41:16.676-04:002010-09-05T08:41:16.676-04:00God this is aweful. I wish I could say I couldn...God this is aweful. I wish I could say I couldn't believe it.<br /><br />Just knowing that there are people who watch this stuff makes my belief in humanity drop off into nothing. I mean, if there were a video of terrible things happening to me or you, how many people would watch it and like watching it? 20 percent of people? 90 percent of people? If it just popped up in front of them and they could watch it and no one would know?<br /><br />I HATE that we hold videos of crimes and make them public, have we changed that yet? In fact I HATE that they make social workers watch this stuff. NO YOU DO NOT HAVE TO WATCH THAT TO HAVE EMPATHY AND COMPASSION AND BE A GOOD SERVICE PROVIDER. It's sick.<br /><br />That ish, pisses me of. Grrrr.SustainableFamilieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08820607553556177222noreply@blogger.com