tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post5383993487540970632..comments2024-03-13T11:14:26.768-04:00Comments on A Radical Profeminist: Antifeminist Het FATHERS RIGHTS ALERT: It's HET FATHERS who want THE RIGHT to KILL HET GUYS--for doing what THOSE FATHERS ONCE DID. (It's not Radical Feminists)Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-26862226343670760962010-03-11T21:08:11.133-05:002010-03-11T21:08:11.133-05:00Thank you, Stew. Thank you so much for seeing this...Thank you, Stew. Thank you so much for seeing this so clearly.<br /><br />Now, if only every other het man would.<br /><br />But you've done your part.<br /><br />Thank you.Julian Realhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02933612851144914687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-31494981890016827962010-03-11T15:33:03.663-05:002010-03-11T15:33:03.663-05:00I'm left a little flabbergasted at how insight...I'm left a little flabbergasted at how insightful and accurate and unconventional this post is. So obvious, so glaringly obvious. Can't even figure out what I want to say. <br /><br />What initially strikes me is the extent to which control of others (particularly women and girls, but also other males) is at the root of this. At no point skimming through the posts did i see anyone saying anything along the lines of "I wish some father had shot me when i was young and A DOG" to prevent them doing any further terrible things. They just don't want OTHER men doing those terrible things to THEIR women and girls, now that THEY'VE matured and know what's best for those under their protection.aboynamedstewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12789173741927485414noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-90204133948293874012010-03-10T13:43:45.608-05:002010-03-10T13:43:45.608-05:00Yes, Christina,
And if any white het men doubt it...Yes, Christina,<br /><br />And if any white het men doubt it, answer me this, white guy: why did your people create laws to make that be so???Julian Realhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02933612851144914687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-84589198880925152912010-03-10T09:04:10.054-05:002010-03-10T09:04:10.054-05:00Everything stated here is 120 percent true, but I ...Everything stated here is 120 percent true, but I also think it proves beyond a shadow of doubt just how selfish and self-centered white het men are.<br /><br />Each individual WHM believes that the world revolves around him, all women and girls are there for his entertainment and pleasure. Eventually he gets to own one in the form of his daughter. <br /><br />As the world revolves around him, no other man or boy may touch his property but it is ok for him to mess with any other woman or girl no matter who she belongs to (sarcasm)<br /><br /> <br /><br />Fathers who abuse their daughters believe this is acceptable, because after all, their daughters are their property and they can do to their property what ever they wish.Christinahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03409494179906849654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-69417984014967710482010-03-09T14:20:10.522-05:002010-03-09T14:20:10.522-05:00Yes, Jennifer. Yes.
And it's only because in ...Yes, Jennifer. Yes.<br /><br />And it's only because in the gender hierarchy that women get the stigma, and men get the status, that the penis comes away "clean" while the vulva and vagina are perpetually dirty. And men come away "clean" but women are perpetually "dirty". And men, particularly and especially white het men, can never, ever be understood as "sl*ts", "wh*res", "b*tches", and dirty-as-hell, vile-as-hell, and degraded by their own activities, as long as the white het male supremacist systems afford them this teflon coating allowing any and all stigmas to slide off them, onto people who are tainted by white het men's criminally unlawful and civilly unjust--or, worse, lawful and seemingly just--activities.<br /><br />I place the stigmas back where they belong, to their owners, to the finger-pointers, who delight in calling everyone else what only they have the power to be, through doing unto others what they would never have done unto themselves... even while, as noted above, they threaten to do it often enough.<br /><br />As you note, and as has been noted here many times, radical feminists don't do the things to men that men do to other men, but men are, after all is said and done, cowardly in ways that are astonishing, given the assumptions of white het men being brave and bold. They cower in their own presence, afraid to name anything each other does as fucked up and wrong... for fear that their socially approved and institutionally protected abilities to do violence to those they see as "beneath them"--or who they force to literally be beneath them, as in during many forms of rape.<br /><br />These white het guys are afraid that their rage might shift into a more horizontal position, targeting their political peers, guns aimed at each other. And loaded.Julian Realhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02933612851144914687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6744114065733119575.post-38493608354908388342010-03-09T09:41:27.374-05:002010-03-09T09:41:27.374-05:00White male supremacist society has never ever been...White male supremacist society has never ever been logical or rational which is why these violent heterosexual men attempt to outdo other white heterosexual men's claims of how they would commit lethal violence against any 'boy' who attempts to 'bang' their personal sexual property. Now we all know women and girls are men's private property do we not, which is why these males are so busily engaged in keeping other white male supremacists away from their property. But at the same time these white male supremacists also believe any woman or girl not owned by them is public heterosexual male property, which is why prostitution is the oldest form of male violence against women. Women did not create prostitution - men did and it continues to be men who are demanding women and girls who do not belong to them to be made available to them 24/7. <br /><br />Question - who are the sluts - the daughters of these misogynistic white men or the white fathers boasting to each other concerning their sluttish and whorish behavior. Slut means white heterosexual men who think it is their inalienable right to sexually abuse women and girls because white male supremacist society condones men's whorish behavior.<br /><br />Since the penis is supposedly the organ which 'makes a girl into a woman' and hence a "slut" then clearly the penis and its owner is the one who is dirty - not the other way round. Denise Thompson in her book Radical Feminism Today explains the issue very clearly. 'If it is being used by the penis which brings women into disrepute, then the negative values of degradation, debasement and corruption belong with the penis. If it is the penis which disgraces women, then it is the penis which is the original disgrace. Thus does male supremacy expose itself for those with the will to see.'<br /><br />But white male supremacists are never logical because they are too concerned with other white heterosexual male supremacists calling them 'effeminate males.' <br /> <br />Question - when was the last time a radical feminist murdered a white male supremacist? Answer: it has never happened but every day men murder women and children and the usual misogynistic excuses<br />are used to justify men committing femicide.JENNIFER DREWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02112807166372869685noreply@blogger.com